
According to my stats on flickr, this is my most viewed photo. More than my comment-blocked, Galaxy-ad skin series, more than the buttery-toned ones from the disused elevator shaft, more than the comedy Easter batch, more than my, ahem, immensely clever kiwi eyes and my beautiful Paris set. More even than my crusty classic ‘Old Woman with Bread’ – a relic which I’m sure people only visit to chuckle at the dodgy photoshopping.
Is this what designer labels are all about? I think it is a boring image, with dull colours, no clarity and no purpose. It doesn’t say anything to me, and I’m the one that took it – it must say even less to everyone else. I suppose this is the essence of a popular label: people will follow it regardless of what it produces. You’ve only got to look at Nike and its horrendous Shox trainers, now a chav staple the world over, and I won’t even start on Microsoft.
It’s such a shame when people blindly follow big names to the detriment of real quality, potential and innovation from the plethora of enterprising upstarts out there. And most of the time they don’t know what they’re missing – moving out of the herd and into the unknown is a risk most of us are afraid of taking.
I feel like I’m on the verge of something important here, something fundamental, so to do it justice and attempt to claim some kind of pathetic ownership for this idea that has clearly been around forever, I’m going to baaaaptise it ’sheep theory’. A quick Google of my hastily constructed doctrine reveals that extensive research has already been conducted in this area and I may have to compete with a sister sheep theory, possibly pioneered by an real live sheep.








